Hyphen

From Entri
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Term |HasUserLanguage=eng |HasAuthor=Quisadmi |HasTermDate=2016/11/29 |HasSourceLanguage=eng |HasTranslationsLanguage=<span class="NL">nld</span>, <span class="DE">deu</span...")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|HasTermDate=2016/11/29
 
|HasTermDate=2016/11/29
 
|HasSourceLanguage=eng
 
|HasSourceLanguage=eng
|HasTranslationsLanguage=<span class="NL">nld</span>, <span class="DE">deu</span>
 
 
|TranslationINnld=koppelteken
 
|TranslationINnld=koppelteken
 
|TranslationINnnl=
 
|TranslationINnnl=
Line 73: Line 72:
 
|TranslationINfsv=
 
|TranslationINfsv=
 
|SynonymINfsv=
 
|SynonymINfsv=
|HasComment=== Grammar ==
+
|HasComment=== Grammar & style ==
  
 
Some authors claim ''there is no firm rule to help you decide which words are run together, hyphenated or left separate'' (http://www.economist.com/style-guide/hyphens The Economist). Others tend to disagree: ''The basic rule is straightforward: you need a hyphen to join two (or more) modifiers if the words taken together modify a noun that follows'' (http://roskylegaled.com/blog/post/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate/ Rosky Legal Education).
 
Some authors claim ''there is no firm rule to help you decide which words are run together, hyphenated or left separate'' (http://www.economist.com/style-guide/hyphens The Economist). Others tend to disagree: ''The basic rule is straightforward: you need a hyphen to join two (or more) modifiers if the words taken together modify a noun that follows'' (http://roskylegaled.com/blog/post/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate/ Rosky Legal Education).
 +
 +
== Remarks ==
 +
 +
On Entri authors should apply the rules as laid out on Kathy Sieckman's 'Proof That' blog (see ''Further reading'').
  
 
== Examples ==
 
== Examples ==
Line 85: Line 88:
  
 
* ''Hyphenation: Compounding and Word Division'' on [http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect2&info0=2 BtB]
 
* ''Hyphenation: Compounding and Word Division'' on [http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect2&info0=2 BtB]
* To Hyphenate or Not to Hyphenate: That is the Question on [https://proofthat.blogspot.com/2013/04/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate-that.html Proof That]
+
* ''To Hyphenate or Not to Hyphenate: That is the Question'' on [https://proofthat.blogspot.com/2013/04/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate-that.html Proof That]
 
+
 
+
 
|TermStatus=Supervisor
 
|TermStatus=Supervisor
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 14:36, 29 November 2016

{{Term

|HasUserLanguage=eng |HasAuthor=Quisadmi |HasTermDate=2016/11/29 |HasSourceLanguage=eng |HasTranslationsLanguage=nld, deu |TranslationINnld=koppelteken |TranslationINnnl= |SynonymINnnl= |TranslationINbnl= |SynonymINbnl= |TranslationINces= |SynonymINces= |TranslationINdeu=Bindestrich |TranslationINdde= |SynonymINdde= |TranslationINade= |SynonymINade= |TranslationINbde= |SynonymINbde= |TranslationINcde= |SynonymINcde= |TranslationINlde= |SynonymINlde= |TranslationINeng= |SynonymINeng= |TranslationINbri= |SynonymINbri= |TranslationIName= |SynonymIName= |TranslationINaus= |SynonymINaus= |TranslationINcae= |SynonymINcae= |TranslationINnze= |SynonymINnze= |TranslationINrus= |SynonymINrus= |TranslationINfra= |SynonymINfra= |TranslationINffr= |SynonymINffr= |TranslationINbfr= |SynonymINbfr= |TranslationINcaf= |SynonymINcaf= |TranslationINcfr= |SynonymINcfr= |TranslationINlfr= |SynonymINlfr= |TranslationINint= |SynonymINint= |TranslationINita= |SynonymINita= |TranslationINpol= |SynonymINpol= |TranslationINslk= |SynonymINslk= |TranslationINspa= |SynonymINspa= |TranslationINspc= |SynonymINspc= |TranslationINesc= |SynonymINesc= |TranslationINesg= |SynonymINesg= |TranslationINeus= |SynonymINeus= |TranslationINsve= |SynonymINsve= |TranslationINssv= |SynonymINssv= |TranslationINfsv= |SynonymINfsv= |HasComment=== Grammar ==

Some authors claim ''there is no firm rule to help you decide which words are run together, hyphenated or left separate'' (http://www.economist.com/style-guide/hyphens The Economist). Others tend to disagree: ''The basic rule is straightforward: you need a hyphen to join two (or more) modifiers if the words taken together modify a noun that follows'' (http://roskylegaled.com/blog/post/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate/ Rosky Legal Education).

== Examples ==

  • [[far-reaching consequences]]
  • [[third-party manufacturer]]

== Further reading ==

  • ''Hyphenation: Compounding and Word Division'' on [http://www.btb.termiumplus.gc.ca/tcdnstyl-chap?lang=eng&lettr=chapsect2&info0=2 BtB]
  • To Hyphenate or Not to Hyphenate: That is the Question on [https://proofthat.blogspot.com/2013/04/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate-that.html Proof That]


|TermStatus=Supervisor

}}
Hyphen
- eng -
Qa lights green.png

Contents

















YES

Translations

LanguageLink
deuBindestrich
nldkoppelteken

Grammar & style

Some authors claim there is no firm rule to help you decide which words are run together, hyphenated or left separate (http://www.economist.com/style-guide/hyphens The Economist). Others tend to disagree: The basic rule is straightforward: you need a hyphen to join two (or more) modifiers if the words taken together modify a noun that follows (http://roskylegaled.com/blog/post/to-hyphenate-or-not-to-hyphenate/ Rosky Legal Education).

Remarks

On Entri authors should apply the rules as laid out on Kathy Sieckman's 'Proof That' blog (see Further reading).

Examples

Further reading

  • Hyphenation: Compounding and Word Division on BtB
  • To Hyphenate or Not to Hyphenate: That is the Question on Proof That


koppelteken


Bindestrich


















Supervisor

eng

2016/11/29 User:Quisadmi

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Terms
Tools
Miscellaneous